Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


Form 10-Q

 


 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period                          to                     

Commission file number 001-10962

 


Callaway Golf Company

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

Delaware   95-3797580

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

2180 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad, CA 92008

(760) 931-1771

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of principal executive offices)

 


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer  x                    Accelerated filer  ¨                    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $.01 par value, as of October 31, 2007 was 66,286,271.

 



Important Notice to Investors: Statements made in this report that relate to future plans, events, liquidity, financial results or performance including statements relating to cash flows and liquidity, as well as estimated unrecognized compensation expense, projected capital expenditures, and future contractual obligations, are forward-looking statements as defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based upon current information and expectations. These estimates could differ materially from the Company’s actual results if the information on which the estimates were based ultimately proves to be incorrect or incomplete as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including delays, difficulties, changed strategies, or unanticipated factors affecting the implementation of the Company’s gross margin initiatives as well as the general risks and uncertainties applicable to the Company and its business. For details concerning these and other risks and uncertainties, see Part I, Item IA, “Risk Factors” of our most recent Form 10-K as well as the Company’s other reports subsequently filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Investors should also be aware that while the Company from time to time does communicate with securities analysts, it is against the Company’s policy to disclose to them any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information. Furthermore, the Company has a policy against distributing or confirming financial forecasts or projections issued by analysts and any reports issued by such analysts are not the responsibility of the Company. Investors should not assume that the Company agrees with any report issued by any analyst or with any statements, projections, forecasts or opinions contained in any such report.

Callaway Golf Company Trademarks: The following marks and phrases, among others, are trademarks of Callaway Golf Company: A Passion For Excellence—Apex—Ben Hogan—BH—Big Bertha—Black Series—Callaway—Callaway Collection—Callaway Golf—Callaway Golf Drysport—Chev—Chevron Device—Complete—Demonstrably Superior and Pleasingly Different—Dual Force—ERC—Explosive Distance.Amazing Soft Feel—Flying Lady—Ft-i—FT-3—FT-5—Fusion—Game Series-Gems—Great Big Bertha—Heavenwood—Hogan—HX—HX Hot—HX Pearl—HX Tour—Little Ben—Marksman—Molitor—Number One Putter in Golf—Odyssey—OptiFit-ORG.14—Rossie—S2H2—SRT—SenSert—Speed Slot-Steelhead—Strata—Stronomic—Sure-Out—T design—Tech Series—Top-Flite—Top-Flite D2—Top-Flite XL—Tour Authentic—Tour Deep—Trade In! Trade Up!—TriBall—Tru Bore—Tunite—VFT—War Bird—Warbird—Warmsport-White Hot—White Hot XG—White Steel—Windsport—World’s Friendliest—X-20—X460—XL 3000—XJ Series—XL Extreme—X-Forged—X Hot—X-Series—X-Sole—X-SPANN—Xtra Traction Technology—X-Tour—XTT—Xtra Width Technology—XWT.

 

2


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

INDEX

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.   

Financial Statements (Unaudited)

   4
  

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006

   4
  

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

   5
  

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

   6
  

Consolidated Condensed Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2007

   7
  

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

   8
Item 2.   

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   26
Item 3.   

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

   39
Item 4.   

Controls and Procedures

   41
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION   
Item 1.   

Legal Proceedings

   42
Item 1A.   

Risk Factors

   43
Item 2.   

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

   43
Item 3.   

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

   44
Item 4.   

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

   44
Item 5.   

Other Information

   44
Item 6.   

Exhibits

   44

 

3


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

     September 30,
2007
    December 31,
2006
 
ASSETS     

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 31,640     $ 46,362  

Accounts receivable, net

     165,002       118,133  

Inventories, net

     213,902       265,110  

Deferred taxes, net

     39,488       32,813  

Income taxes receivable

     —         9,094  

Other current assets

     21,217       21,688  
                

Total current assets

     471,249       493,200  

Property, plant and equipment, net

     127,103       131,224  

Intangible assets, net

     141,818       144,326  

Goodwill

     32,130       30,833  

Deferred taxes

     28,193       18,821  

Other assets

     30,604       27,543  
                
   $ 831,097     $ 845,947  
                
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY     

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ 113,553     $ 111,360  

Accrued employee compensation and benefits

     37,776       18,731  

Accrued warranty expense

     13,067       13,364  

Income taxes payable

     4,436       —    

Credit facilities

     932       80,000  
                

Total current liabilities

     169,764       223,455  

Long-term liabilities:

    

Energy derivative valuation account

     19,922       19,922  

Income taxes payable

     14,278       —    

Deferred taxes

     19,493       16,256  

Deferred compensation

     7,900       7,210  

Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary

     1,865       1,987  

Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)

    

Shareholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006

     —         —    

Common stock, $.01 par value, 240,000,000 shares authorized, 85,126,864 shares and 85,096,782 shares issued at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively

     851       851  

Additional paid-in capital

     415,068       402,628  

Unearned compensation

     (2,081 )     (3,566 )

Retained earnings

     491,140       435,074  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     20,367       11,135  

Less: Grantor Stock Trust held at market value, 1,840,147 shares and 5,184,601 shares
at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively

     (29,461 )     (74,710 )

Less: Common stock held in treasury, at cost, 18,174,393 shares and 11,957,968 shares at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively

     (298,009 )     (194,295 )
                

Total shareholders’ equity

     597,875       577,117  
                
   $ 831,097     $ 845,947  
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

4


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

    

Three Months Ended

September 30,

   

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

 
     2007     2006     2007     2006  

Net sales

   $ 235,549    100 %   $ 193,763     100 %   $ 950,173     100 %   $ 838,023     100 %

Cost of sales

     141,543    60 %     126,058     65 %     520,321     55 %     498,720     60 %
                                       

Gross profit

     94,006    40 %     67,705     35 %     429,852     45 %     339,303     40 %

Operating expenses:

                 

Selling expense

     65,808    28 %     56,949     29 %     222,009     23 %     202,122     24 %

General and administrative expense

     19,394    8 %     20,901     11 %     65,139     7 %     59,226     7 %

Research and development expense

     7,928    3 %     6,788     4 %     23,851     3 %     19,786     2 %
                                       

Total operating expenses

     93,130    40 %     84,638     44 %     310,999     33 %     281,134     34 %
                                       

Income (loss) from operations

     876    0 %     (16,933 )   (9 )%     118,853     13 %     58,169     7 %

Other income (expense), net

     1,223        (1,058 )       (2,006 )       (2,029 )  
                                       

Income (loss) before income taxes

     2,099    1 %     (17,991 )   (9 )%     116,847     12 %     56,140     7 %

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     830        (6,075 )       46,103         22,656    
                                       

Net income (loss)

   $ 1,269    1 %   $ (11,916 )   (6 )%   $ 70,744     7 %   $ 33,484     4 %
                                       

Earnings (loss) per common share:

                 

Basic

   $ 0.02      $ (0.18 )     $ 1.05       $ 0.49    

Diluted

   $ 0.02      $ (0.18 )     $ 1.03       $ 0.49    

Weighted-average shares outstanding:

                 

Basic

     66,516        67,000         67,250         67,980    

Diluted

     67,639        67,000         68,407         68,777    

Dividends declared per share

   $ 0.07      $ 0.07       $ 0.21       $ 0.21    

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

5


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

    

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

 
     2007     2006  

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

   $ 70,744     $ 33,484  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     27,464       23,961  

Non-cash share-based compensation

     8,207       9,611  

Deferred taxes

     1,444       (3,573 )

(Gain) loss on disposal of long-lived assets

     (3,425 )     1,047  

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:

    

Accounts receivable, net

     (39,978 )     (33,286 )

Inventories, net

     57,187       5,424  

Other assets

     652       1,501  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     (6,904 )     (11,452 )

Accrued employee compensation and benefits

     18,583       (4,494 )

Accrued warranty expense

     (297 )     890  

Income taxes payable

     11,750       6,686  

Other liabilities

     415       (1,238 )
                

Net cash provided by operating activities

     145,842       28,561  
                

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Capital expenditures

     (24,130 )     (28,551 )

Proceeds from sale of capital assets

     5,491       468  

Investment in golf related ventures

     (1,310 )     —    

Acquisitions, net of cash required

     —         (5,911 )
                

Net cash used in investing activities

     (19,949 )     (33,994 )
                

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Issuance of common stock

     47,672       9,053  

Dividends paid, net

     (14,241 )     (9,695 )

Acquisition of treasury stock

     (101,387 )     (52,872 )

(Payments on) proceeds from credit facilities, net

     (79,068 )     60,000  

Tax benefit from exercise of stock options

     4,537       805  

Other financing activities

     (122 )     (16 )
                

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

     (142,609 )     7,275  
                

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     1,994       1,178  
                

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (14,722 )     3,020  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

     46,362       49,481  
                

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

   $ 31,640     $ 52,501  
                

Non-cash financing activities:

    

Payable for the acquisition of treasury stock

   $ 2,327     $ —    

Dividends payable

   $ —       $ 4,758  

Issuance of restricted stock

   $ —       $ 5,328  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

6


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

    Common Stock   Additional
Paid-in
Capital
    Unearned
Compensation
    Retained
Earnings
    Accu-
mulated
Other
Compre-
hensive
Income
  Grantor
Stock
Trust
    Treasury Stock     Total     Compre-
hensive
Income
                 
  Shares     Amount             Shares     Amount      

Balance, December 31, 2006

  85,097     $ 851   $ 402,628     $ (3,566 )   $ 435,074     $ 11,135   $ (74,710 )   (11,958 )   $ (194,295 )   $ 577,117    

Adoption of FIN 48

  —         —       —         —         (437 )     —       —       —         —         (437 )  

Exercise of stock options

  50       —       (6,273 )     —         —         —       51,144     —         —         44,871    

Tax benefit from exercise of stock options

  —         —       3,295       —         —         —       —       —         —         3,295    

Compensatory stock and stock options

  (20 )     —       6,722       1,485       —         —       —       —         —         8,207    

Acquisition of treasury stock

  —         —       —         —         —         —       —       (6,216 )     (103,714 )     (103,714 )  

Employee stock purchase plan

  —         —       (474 )     —         —         —       3,275     —         —         2,801    

Cash dividends declared

  —         —       —         —         (14,241 )     —       —       —         —         (14,241 )  

Adjustment of Grantor Stock Trust shares to market value

  —         —       9,170       —         —         —       (9,170 )   —         —         —      

Equity adjustment from foreign currency translation

  —         —       —         —         —         9,232     —       —         —         9,232     $ 9,232

Net income

  —         —       —         —         70,744       —       —       —         —         70,744       70,744
                                                                             

Balance, September 30, 2007

  85,127     $ 851   $ 415,068     $ (2,081 )   $ 491,140     $ 20,367   $ (29,461 )   (18,174 )   $ (298,009 )   $ 597,875     $ 79,976
                                                                             

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

7


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared by Callaway Golf Company (the “Company”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These consolidated condensed financial statements, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods and dates presented. Interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates and assumptions.

2. Income Taxes

The Company calculates its interim income tax provision in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting” and FASB Interpretation No. 18, “Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods.” At the end of each interim period, the Company estimates the annual effective tax rate and applies that rate to its ordinary quarterly earnings. The tax expense or benefit related to significant, unusual, or extraordinary items that will be separately reported or reported net of their related tax effect, and are individually computed are recognized in the interim period in which those items occur. In addition, the effect of changes in enacted tax laws or rates or tax status is recognized in the interim period in which the change occurs.

The computation of the annual estimated effective tax rate at each interim period requires certain estimates and significant judgment including, but not limited to, the expected operating income for the year, projections of the proportion of income earned and taxed in foreign jurisdictions, permanent and temporary differences as a result differences between amounts measured and recognized in accordance with tax laws and financial accounting standards, and the likelihood of recovering deferred tax assets generated in the current year. The accounting estimates used to compute the provision for income taxes may change as new events occur, additional information is obtained or as the tax environment changes.

The effective tax rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 was 40% compared to 34% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The change in the effective tax rate is primarily due to differences year-over-year in the Company’s annual estimated pre-tax income and the relative impact of permanent differences on pre-tax income. When the Company’s annual estimated income tax rate changes, the year-to-date effect of the change is recorded in the current period, which can cause fluctuations in effective tax rates in interim periods. During the third quarter of 2006, the Company revised its forecast of earnings for the year which had the effect of significantly reducing the effective tax rate on the loss incurred for the quarter. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was 39% compared to 40% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The slight decrease in tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 resulted from increased estimated annual domestic manufacturing tax benefits and research and development tax credits, partially offset by an increase in the state income tax rate due to recent state law changes.

 

8


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

The Company is required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States and various other income tax returns in foreign jurisdictions. The preparation of these income tax returns requires the Company to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax paid by the Company. The Company, in consultation with its tax advisors, bases its income tax returns on interpretations that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The income tax returns, however, are subject to routine audits by the various federal, state and international taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Company files its income tax returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the tax positions taken by the Company. The resolution of any disagreements over the Company’s tax positions often involves complex issues and may span multiple years, particularly if litigation is involved. The ultimate resolution of these tax positions is often uncertain until the audit is complete and any disagreements are resolved. As required under applicable accounting rules, the Company therefore accrues an amount for its estimate of additional tax liability, including interest and penalties, for any uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. The Company reviews and updates the accrual for uncertain tax positions as more definitive information becomes available from taxing authorities, completion of tax audits, expiration of statute of limitations, or upon occurrence of other events.

As required, through December 31, 2006, the Company recorded its accrual for uncertain tax positions based upon SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” which required the Company to accrue for the estimated additional amount of taxes for the uncertain tax positions if it was probable the Company would be required to pay such additional taxes. Effective January 1, 2007, the Company was required to adopt and implement the provisions of FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), which requires the Company to accrue for the estimated additional amount of taxes for uncertain tax positions if it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to pay such additional taxes. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than 50% likelihood of being sustained. As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized an increase in the liability for its uncertain tax positions of $437,000, of which the entire charge was accounted for as a decrease to the beginning balance of retained earnings.

Certain tax matters, including the accrual for uncertain tax positions, can result in a difference between the estimated benefit recorded in the Company’s financial statements and the benefit taken or expected to be taken in the Company’s income tax returns. This difference is generally referred to as an “unrecognized tax benefit.” As of January 1, 2007, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax benefits was $21,551,000. This liability can be reduced by $14,328,000 for offsetting tax benefits associated with the correlative effects of potential transfer pricing adjustments, state income taxes and timing adjustments. The net amount of $7,223,000 if recognized would affect the Company’s financial statements and favorably affect the Company’s effective income tax rate. As of September 30, 2007, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax benefits was $14,350,000 and was recorded as a short-term income tax payable of $342,000 and a long-term income tax payable of $14,008,000. This liability can be reduced by $6,786,000 of offsetting tax benefits associated with the correlative effects of potential transfer pricing adjustments, state income taxes and timing adjustments and was recorded as deferred income taxes related to the adoption of FIN 48. The net amount of $7,564,000, if recognized, would affect the Company’s financial statements and favorably affect the Company’s effective income tax rate. The offsetting transfer pricing adjustments to both income taxes payable and deferred income taxes from January 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007 referred to above are primarily related to the execution of the bilateral Advanced Pricing Agreement between the United States and Japan during the quarter ended June 30, 2007.

The Company does expect changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months; however, the Company does not expect the change to have a significant impact on its results of operations or its financial position.

 

9


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

The Company’s continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had accrued $1,050,000 (before federal and state tax benefit) for the payment of interest and penalties. There were no material changes to the accrual for interest and penalties since the adoption of FIN 48.

The Internal Revenue Service field examination of tax years 2001 through 2003 is complete and certain issues are pending before IRS Appeals. It is reasonably possible that resolution can be reached by September 30, 2008. Any possible settlement could increase/(decrease) earnings but is not expected to be significant. Audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements are subject to significant uncertainty.

The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the US federal jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is generally no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities in its major jurisdictions as follows:

 

Tax Jurisdiction

  

Years No Longer Subject to Audit

U.S. federal

   2000 and prior

California (U.S.)

   2001 and prior

Australia

   2002 and prior

Canada

   2001 and prior

Japan

   2003 and prior

Korea

   2001 and prior

United Kingdom

   2000 and prior

3. Inventories

Inventories are summarized below (in thousands):

 

    

September 30,

2007

  

December 31,

2006

Inventories, net:

     

Raw materials

   $ 76,573    $ 85,798

Work-in-process

     1,215      4,195

Finished goods

     136,114      175,117
             
   $ 213,902    $ 265,110
             

4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The Company accounts for its goodwill and other non-amortizing intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Under SFAS No. 142, the Company’s goodwill and certain intangible assets are not amortized throughout the period, but are subject to an annual impairment test. Patents and other intangible assets are recorded at cost at the time of acquisition and amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range over periods between 1-16 years. During the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, aggregate amortization expense was approximately $835,000 and $838,000, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, aggregate amortization expense was approximately $2,508,000 and $2,465,000, respectively.

 

10


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

The following sets forth the intangible assets by major asset class (dollars in thousands):

 

    

Useful

Life

(Years)

   September 30, 2007    December 31, 2006
      Gross   

Accumulated

Amortization

  

Net Book

Value

   Gross   

Accumulated

Amortization

  

Net Book

Value

Non-Amortizing:

                    

Trade name, trademark and trade dress

   N/A    $ 121,794    $ —      $ 121,794    $ 121,794    $ —      $ 121,794

Amortizing:

                    

Patents

   3-16      36,459      17,584      18,875      36,459      15,471      20,988

Other

   1-9      2,853      1,704      1,149      2,853      1,309      1,544
                                            

Total intangible assets

      $ 161,106    $ 19,288    $ 141,818    $ 161,106    $ 16,780    $ 144,326
                                            

Amortization expense related to intangible assets at September 30, 2007 in each of the next five fiscal years and beyond is expected to be incurred as follows (in thousands):

 

Remainder of 2007

   $ 838

2008

     3,153

2009

     2,978

2010

     2,838

2011

     2,587

2012

     2,158

Thereafter

     5,472
      
   $ 20,024
      

Goodwill at September 30, 2007 was $32,130,000. Changes in goodwill during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $695,000 and $1,297,000, respectively, and were due to favorable foreign currency fluctuations.

5. Investments

Investment in Golf Entertainment International Limited Company

During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company made an investment in Golf Entertainment International Limited (“GEI”), the owner and operator of TopGolf entertainment centers. In connection with this investment, the Company acquired Preferred Shares of GEI for approximately $10,000,000. The Company accounts for this investment under the cost method in accordance with the provisions of APB Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock” and reflected the investment balance in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.

In addition, the Company and GEI entered into a Preferred Partner Agreement under which the Company is granted preferred signage rights, the option to supply golf balls for the TopGolf driving ranges, rights as the preferred supplier of golf products used or offered for use at TopGolf facilities at prices no less than those paid by the Company’s customers, preferred retail positioning in the TopGolf retail stores, access to consumer information obtained by TopGolf, and other rights incidental to those listed.

 

11


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

In August 2007, the Company entered into a loan agreement with GEI in order to provide funding to GEI for certain capital projects as well as operational needs. The loan agreement extends to all shareholders of GEI, whereby each shareholder may participate by funding up to an amount agreed upon by GEI. In August 2007, the Company funded $1,310,000 under the loan program and funded its remaining commitment of $819,000 subsequent to September 30, 2007. The loan agreement provides for the option, at the Company’s discretion, to convert up to 100 percent of the amount drawn by GEI, including accrued interest, into convertible preferred shares. The Company currently has no intention to convert the amount funded to GEI into preferred shares.

Investment in Qingdao Suntech Sporting Goods Limited Company

In October 2006, the Company entered into a Golf Ball Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with Qingdao Suntech Sporting Goods Limited Company (“Suntech”), where Suntech manufactures and supplies certain golf balls solely for and to the Company. Suntech is a wholly owned subsidiary of Suntech Mauritius Limited Company (“Mauritius”), which is jointly owned by Qingdao Sunwoo Sporting Goods Limited Company and another third party. In connection with the agreement, the Company provides Suntech with golf ball raw materials, packing materials, molds, tooling, as well as manufacturing equipment in order to carry out the manufacturing and supply obligations set forth in the agreement. Suntech provides the personnel as well as the facilities to effectively perform these manufacturing and supply obligations. Due to the nature of the arrangement, as well as the controlling influence the Company has in the Suntech operations, the Company is required to consolidate the financial results of Suntech in its consolidated condensed financial statements as of September 30, 2007, in accordance with the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.”

In addition, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement which provides that the Company will make certain loans to Mauritius to provide working capital for Suntech. As of September 30, 2007, the Company has loaned Mauritius a total of $3,200,000 and has completed its obligation under the loan agreement.

6. Product Warranty

The Company has a stated two-year warranty policy for its golf clubs, although the Company’s historical practice has been to honor warranty claims well after the two-year stated warranty period. The Company’s policy is to accrue the estimated cost of warranty coverage at the time the sale is recorded. In estimating its future warranty obligations, the Company considers various relevant factors, including the Company’s stated warranty policies and practices, the historical frequency of claims, and the cost to replace or repair its products under warranty. The decrease in the provision for product warranty claims is primarily attributable to a slight decline in the rate at which warranty claims are accrued. The decrease in the accrual rate reflects an improvement in the historical frequency of claims as well as a reduction in expected claim costs resulting from an increase in the number of clubs repaired compared to the number of clubs replaced. The Company’s estimates have generally been in line with actual claims experience. The following table provides a roll-forward of the activity related to the Company’s reserve for warranty expense (in thousands):

 

    

Three Months Ended

September 30,

   

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

 
     2007     2006     2007     2006  

Beginning balance

   $ 14,365     $ 15,469     $ 13,364     $ 13,267  

Provision

     2,071       2,219       8,702       9,953  

Claims paid/costs incurred

     (3,369 )     (3,531 )     (8,999 )     (9,063 )
                                

Ending balance

   $ 13,067     $ 14,157     $ 13,067     $ 14,157  
                                

 

12


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

7. Financing Arrangements

The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are cash flows provided by operations and the Company’s credit facilities in effect from time to time. The Company currently expects this to continue. The Company’s primary line of credit is a $250,000,000 line of credit with Bank of America, N.A. and certain other lenders party to the Company’s November 5, 2004 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The line of credit was most recently amended effective February 15, 2007, by a Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, the “Line of Credit”), to provide for modification of the financial covenants, the release of all collateral with respect to the obligations under the Line of Credit, the reduction of commitment fee margins and interest rate margins and certain other changes favorable to the Company. The amendment also extends the term of the Line of Credit to February 15, 2012.

The Line of Credit provides for revolving loans of up to $250,000,000, although actual borrowing availability can be effectively limited by the financial covenants contained therein. As of September 30, 2007, the maximum amount that could be borrowed under the Line of Credit was $250,000,000. At September 30, 2007, the Company had no balance outstanding under the Line of Credit and had approximately $932,000 outstanding under other credit facilities.

Under the Line of Credit, the Company is required to pay certain fees, including an unused commitment fee of between 10.0 to 25.0 basis points per annum of the unused commitment amount, with the exact amount determined based upon the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio and trailing four quarters’ earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, as well as other non-cash expense and income items (EBITDA) (each as defined in the agreement governing the Line of Credit). Outstanding borrowings under the Line of Credit accrue interest, at the Company’s election, based upon the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio and trailing four quarters’ EBITDA of (i) the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 50.0 basis points or (b) Bank of America’s prime rate, or (ii) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the agreement governing the Line of Credit) plus a margin of 50.0 to 125.0 basis points.

The Line of Credit requires the Company to meet certain financial covenants and includes certain other restrictions, including restrictions limiting dividends, stock repurchases, capital expenditures and asset sales. As of September 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with the covenants and other terms of the Line of Credit, as then applicable.

The total origination fees incurred in connection with the Line of Credit, including fees incurred in connection with the amendments, were $2,089,000 and are being amortized into interest expense over the remaining term of the Line of Credit agreement. Unamortized origination fees were $1,224,000 as of September 30, 2007, of which $282,000 was included in prepaid and other current assets and $942,000 in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet.

8. Commitments and Contingencies

Tax Matters

The Company is required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States and various other income tax returns in foreign jurisdictions. The preparation of these income tax returns requires the Company to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax paid by the Company. The Company, in consultation with its tax advisors, bases its income tax returns on interpretations that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The income tax returns, however, are subject to routine reviews by the various taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Company files its

 

13


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

income tax returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the interpretations the Company used to calculate its tax liability and therefore require the Company to pay additional taxes.

Legal Matters

In conjunction with the Company’s program of enforcing its proprietary rights, the Company has initiated or may initiate actions against alleged infringers under the intellectual property laws of various countries, including, for example, the U.S. Lanham Act, the U.S. Patent Act, and other pertinent laws. Defendants in these actions may, among other things, contest the validity and/or the enforceability of some of the Company’s patents and/or trademarks. Others may assert counterclaims against the Company. Historically, these matters individually and in the aggregate have not had a material adverse effect upon the financial position or results of operations of the Company. It is possible, however, that in the future one or more defenses or claims asserted by defendants in one or more of those actions may succeed, resulting in the loss of all or part of the rights under one or more patents, loss of a trademark, a monetary award against the Company or some other material loss to the Company. One or more of these results could adversely affect the Company’s overall ability to protect its product designs and ultimately limit its future success in the marketplace.

In addition, the Company from time to time receives information claiming that products sold by the Company infringe or may infringe patent or other intellectual property rights of third parties. It is possible that one or more claims of potential infringement could lead to litigation, the need to obtain licenses, the need to alter a product to avoid infringement, a settlement or judgment, or some other action or material loss by the Company.

On February 9, 2006, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. C.A. 06-91, asserting claims against Acushnet Company for patent infringement. Specifically, Callaway Golf asserts that Acushnet’s sale of the Titleist Pro V1 family of golf balls infringes four golf ball patents that Callaway Golf acquired when it acquired the assets of Top-Flite. Callaway Golf is seeking damages and an injunction to prevent future infringement by Acushnet. In its answer to the Complaint, Acushnet has responded that the patents at issue are invalid and not infringed by the Pro V1 golf balls. Acushnet also has filed petitions for reexamination with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). Although the PTO agreed the petitions for reexamination raised certain substantial new questions of patentability, and has issued a first office action preliminarily rejecting the claims of all four of the patents, based on some of the arguments advanced by Acushnet, the PTO has not made a final and binding determination as to the validity of the patents. The validity of the asserted patents has also not yet been addressed by the District Court. Additionally, the District Court has denied Acushnet’s motion to stay the litigation pending a re-examination in the PTO. On August 1, 2007, the District Court denied Acushnet’s renewed motion to stay the litigation pending re-examination in the PTO. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. The trial of this matter is set to commence in the District Court on December 3, 2007.

On June 9, 2007, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. C.A. 07-367, asserting claims against Acushnet Company for patent infringement. Callaway Golf asserts that Acushnet’s sale of numerous drivers, including but not limited to the King Cobra 454 Comp, King Cobra F Speed, King Cobra HS9 F Speed, King Cobra HS9 M speed, and King Cobra LD F Speed, Titleist 905R, Titleist 905S and Titleist 905T drivers infringes one or more of U.S. patent numbers 6,348,015; 6,478,692; 6,669,579; 6,685,576; and 6,949,032. Callaway Golf is seeking damages and an injunction to prevent future infringement. Acushnet has answered the complaint denying infringement of any valid patent and asserting counterclaims against Callaway Golf. Acushnet asserts that sales of Callaway Golf’s FT-i, FT-5, X-460, X-460 Tour, Big Bertha Fusion FT-3 and Big Bertha 460 drivers infringe two patents issued to Acushnet, namely U.S.

 

14


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

patent numbers 6,960,142 and 7,041,003. Acushnet seeks damages and an injunction as well. Callaway Golf responded to the counterclaim on August 31, 2007, denying infringement of any valid patent claim. The parties are engaged in preliminary discovery. The trial of this matter is set to commence in the District Court on May 18, 2009.

On August 1, 2007, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 207CV329, asserting claims of patent infringement against TaylorMade Golf Company, Inc. Specifically, Callaway Golf is asserting that sales of certain TaylorMade irons infringe Callaway Golf’s U.S. patent No. 5,704,849. Callaway Golf is seeking damages and an injunction to prevent future infringement. On September 4, 2007, TaylorMade answered the complaint denying infringement. The parties are engaged in motion and discovery practice.

On August 4, 2007, Callaway Golf filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. 07 CV 1424, asserting claims against TaylorMade Golf Company, Inc. for patent infringement and seeking declaratory relief. Specifically, Callaway Golf asserts that TaylorMade’s sales of its TP Red and TP Black golf balls infringe Callaway Golf’s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,638,185 and 7,160,207, which relate to multi-layer golf balls. Callaway Golf is also seeking declarations of license, invalidity, unenforceability, and/or non-infringement of TaylorMade’s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,991,558, 7,198,575, 6,719,644, and 6,547,678. TaylorMade filed an answer and counterclaim asserting non-infringement and/or invalidity of Callaway Golf’s golf ball patents. TaylorMade also asserts that certain of Callaway Golf’s drivers, including the FT-i, FT-5, and Big Bertha 460 infringe its above-named patents and related patent applications. In addition, Taylor Made is seeking declarations of invalidity, unenforceability, and non-infringement of Callaway Golf’s U.S. Patent Nos. 5,704,849, 5,409,229 and 5,605,511, which relate to undercut irons. The parties are engaged in motion and discovery practice.

The Company and its subsidiaries, incident to their business activities, are parties to a number of legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims, including the matters specifically noted above. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes are not predictable with assurance. Consequently, management is unable to estimate the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability, amounts which may be covered by insurance, or the financial impact with respect to these matters. Management believes at this time that the final resolution of these matters, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s consolidated annual results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Supply of Electricity and Energy Contracts

In 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with Pilot Power Group, Inc. (“Pilot Power”) as the Company’s energy service provider and in connection therewith entered into a long-term, fixed-priced, fixed-capacity, energy supply contract (the “Enron Contract”) with Enron Energy Services, Inc. (“EESI”), a subsidiary of Enron Corporation, as part of a comprehensive strategy to ensure the uninterrupted supply of energy while capping electricity costs in the volatile California energy market. The Enron Contract provided, subject to the other terms and conditions of the contract, for the Company to purchase nine megawatts of energy per hour from June 1, 2001 through May 31, 2006 (394,416 megawatts over the term of the contract). The total purchase price for such energy over the full contract term would have been approximately $43,484,000.

At the time the Company entered into the Enron Contract, nine megawatts per hour was in excess of the amount the Company expected to be able to use in its operations. The Company agreed to purchase this amount, however, in order to obtain a more favorable price than the Company could have obtained if the Company had purchased a lesser quantity. The Company expected to be able to sell any excess supply through Pilot Power.

 

15


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Because the Enron Contract provided for the Company to purchase an amount of energy in excess of what it expected to be able to use in its operations, the Company accounted for the Enron Contract as a derivative instrument in accordance with SFAS No. 133. “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The Enron Contract did not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. Therefore, the Company recognized changes in the estimated fair value of the Enron Contract currently in earnings. The estimated fair value of the Enron Contract was based upon present value determination of the net differential between the contract price for electricity and the estimated future market prices for electricity as applied to the remaining amount of unpurchased electricity under the Enron Contract. Through September 30, 2001, the Company had recorded unrealized pre-tax losses of $19,922,000.

On November 29, 2001, the Company notified EESI that, among other things, EESI was in default of the Enron Contract and that based upon such default, and for other reasons, the Company was terminating the Enron Contract effective immediately. At the time of termination, the contract price for the remaining energy to be purchased under the Enron Contract through May 2006 was approximately $39,126,000.

On November 30, 2001, EESI notified the Company that it disagreed that it was in default of the Enron Contract and that it was prepared to deliver energy pursuant to the Enron Contract. On December 2, 2001, EESI, along with Enron Corporation and numerous other related entities, filed for bankruptcy. Since November 30, 2001, the parties have not been operating under the Enron Contract and Pilot Power has been providing energy to the Company from alternate suppliers.

As a result of the Company’s notice of termination to EESI, and certain other automatic termination provisions under the Enron Contract, the Company believes that the Enron Contract has been terminated. As a result, the Company adjusted the estimated value of the Enron Contract through the date of termination, at which time the terminated Enron Contract ceased to represent a derivative instrument in accordance with SFAS No. 133. Because the Enron Contract is terminated and neither party to the contract is performing pursuant to the terms of the contract, the Company no longer records valuation adjustments for changes in electricity rates. The Company continues to reflect on its balance sheet the derivative valuation account of $19,922,000, subject to periodic review, in accordance with SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” The Company believes the Enron Contract has been terminated, and as of September 30, 2007, EESI has not asserted any claim against the Company. There can be no assurance, however, that EESI or another party will not assert a future claim against the Company or that a court or arbitrator will not ultimately nullify the Company’s termination of the Enron Contract. No provision has been made for contingencies or obligations, if any, under the Enron Contract beyond November 30, 2001.

Unconditional Purchase Obligations

During the normal course of business, the Company enters into agreements to purchase goods and services, including purchase commitments for production materials, endorsement agreements with professional golfers and other endorsers, employment and consulting agreements, and intellectual property licensing agreements pursuant to which the Company is required to pay royalty fees. It is not possible to determine the amounts the Company will ultimately be required to pay under these agreements as they are subject to many variables including performance-based bonuses, reductions in payment obligations if designated minimum performance criteria are not achieved, and severance arrangements. As of September 30, 2007, the Company has entered into many of these contractual agreements with terms ranging from one to six years. The minimum obligation that the Company is required to pay under these agreements is $110,422,000 over the next six years. In addition, the Company also enters into unconditional purchase obligations with various vendors and suppliers of goods and

 

16


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

services in the normal course of operations through purchase orders or other documentation or that are undocumented except for an invoice. Such unconditional purchase obligations are generally outstanding for periods less than a year and are settled by cash payments upon delivery of goods and services and are not reflected in this total.

Future purchase commitments as of September 30, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):

 

2007

   $ 59,583

2008

     28,673

2009

     11,400

2010

     6,542

2011

     3,562

Thereafter

     662
      
   $ 110,422
      

Other Contingent Contractual Obligations

During its normal course of business, the Company has made certain indemnities, commitments and guarantees under which it may be required to make payments in relation to certain transactions. These include (i) intellectual property indemnities to the Company’s customers and licensees in connection with the use, sale and/or license of Company products, (ii) indemnities to various lessors in connection with facility leases for certain claims arising from such facilities or leases, (iii) indemnities to vendors and service providers pertaining to claims based on the negligence or willful misconduct of the Company and (iv) indemnities involving the accuracy of representations and warranties in certain contracts. The Company also has consulting agreements that provide for payment of nominal fees upon the issuance of patents and/or the commercialization of research results. The Company has also issued a guarantee in the form of a standby letter of credit as security for contingent liabilities under certain workers’ compensation insurance policies. The duration of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees varies, and in certain cases, may be indefinite. The majority of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees do not provide for any limitation on the maximum amount of future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, costs incurred to settle claims related to indemnities have not been material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In addition, the Company believes the likelihood is remote that material payments will be required under the indemnities, commitments and guarantees described above. The fair value of indemnities, commitments and guarantees that the Company issued during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was not material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Employment Contracts

The Company has entered into employment contracts with each of the Company’s officers as well as certain other employees. These contracts generally provide for severance benefits, including salary continuation, if employment is terminated by the Company for convenience or by the officer for good reason. In addition, in order to assure that the officers and other key employees would continue to provide independent leadership consistent with the Company’s best interests in the event of an actual or threatened change in control of the Company, the contracts also generally provide for certain protections in the event of such a change in control. These protections include the payment of certain severance benefits, including salary continuation, upon the termination of employment following a change in control.

 

17


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

9. Share-Based Employee Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (“SFAS 123R”), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards to employees and directors based on estimated fair values. The Company adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation expense for all share-based awards outstanding as of the adoption date is based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123. The valuation provisions of SFAS 123R apply to new share-based awards granted on or after January 1, 2006.

Stock Plans

As of September 30, 2007, the Company had the following two shareholder approved stock plans under which shares were available for equity-based awards: the Callaway Golf Company Amended and Restated 2004 Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) and the 2001 Non-Employee Directors Stock Incentive Plan (the “2001 Directors Plan”). The 2004 Plan permits the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock/units, performance share units and other equity-based awards to the Company’s officers, employees, consultants and certain other non-employees who provide services to the Company. All grants under the 2004 Plan are discretionary, although no participant may receive awards in any one year in excess of 1,000,000 shares. The 2001 Directors Plan permits the granting of stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units. Directors receive an initial equity award grant not to exceed 20,000 shares upon their initial appointment to the Board and thereafter an annual grant not to exceed 10,000 shares upon being re-elected at each annual meeting of shareholders. As a result of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on June 5, 2007, the Company’s shareholders amended and restated the 2004 Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance by an additional 4,250,000 to a total of 12,250,000. The maximum number of shares issuable over the term of the 2001 Directors Plan is 500,000 shares.

The following table presents shares authorized, available for future grant and outstanding under each of the Company’s plans as of September 30, 2007:

 

     Authorized    Available    Outstanding
     (In thousands)

1991 Stock Incentive Plan

   10,000    —      75

Promotion, Marketing and Endorsement Stock Incentive Plan

   3,560    —      570

1995 Employee Stock Incentive Plan

   10,800    —      2,388

1996 Stock Option Plan

   9,000    —      622

2001 Directors Plan

   500    255    233

2004 Plan

   12,250    4,302    2,823

Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan

   840    —      104
              

Total

   46,950    4,557    6,815
              

Stock Options

All stock option grants made under the 2004 Plan and the 2001 Directors Plan are made at exercise prices no less than the Company’s closing stock price on the date of grant. Outstanding stock options generally vest over a three year period from the grant date and generally expire up to 10 years after the grant date. The Company recorded $960,000 and $3,177,000 of compensation expense relating to outstanding stock options for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and $1,397,000 and $4,987,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.

 

18


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

The Company records compensation expense for employee stock options based on the estimated fair value of the options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The model uses various assumptions, including a risk-free interest rate, the expected term of the options, the expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the options, and the expected dividend yield. Compensation expense for employee stock options is recognized ratably over the vesting term and is reduced by an estimate for pre-vesting forfeitures, which is based on the Company’s historical forfeitures of unvested options and awards. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the average estimated pre-vesting forfeiture rate used was 4.3% and 5.2%, respectively. The table below summarizes the average fair value assumptions used in the valuation of stock options granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.

 

    

Three Months Ended

September 30,

   

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

 
     2007     2006     2007     2006  

Dividend yield

   2.0 %   2.0 %   2.0 %   2.0 %

Expected volatility

   37.4 %   37.6 %   37.4 %   39.5 %

Risk free interest rate

   4.1 %   4.5 %   4.7 %   4.7 %

Expected life

   4.1 years     3.0 years     3.1 years     3.2 years  

The expected life of the Company’s options is based on evaluations of historical and expected future employee exercise behavior. The risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected life of the options at the date of the grant. The dividend yield is based upon a three-year historical average. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility, among other factors, of the Company’s stock. The valuation model applied in this calculation utilizes highly subjective assumptions that could potentially change over time. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates of an option. Furthermore, the estimated fair value of an option does not necessarily represent the value that will ultimately be realized by the employee holding the option.

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activities for the first nine months of 2007 (in thousands, except price per share and contractual term):

 

Options

  

Number of

Shares

   

Weighted-

Average

Exercise Price

Per Share

  

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term (Years)

  

Aggregate

Intrinsic Value

Outstanding at January 1, 2007

   9,279     $ 16.84      

Granted

   915     $ 14.51      

Exercised

   (3,192 )   $ 14.05      

Forfeited

   (49 )   $ 14.05      

Expired

   (626 )   $ 31.10      
                  

Outstanding at September 30, 2007

   6,327     $ 16.52    5.53    $ 5,943

Vested and expected to vest in the future at September 30, 2007

   6,173     $ 16.58    5.46    $ 5,673

Exercisable at September 30, 2007

   4,614     $ 17.36    4.41    $ 2,885

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $5.04 and $3.93 per share, respectively and $4.54 and $3.39 per share during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The total intrinsic value for options exercised during

 

19


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $1,000,000 and $11,130,000, respectively, and $45,000 and $1,273,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.

Cash received from the exercise of stock options for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was approximately $4,044,000 and $44,871,000, respectively, and $877,000 and $5,528,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized (tax expense incurred) for the tax deductions from option exercises for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 totaled approximately $282,000 and $3,295,000, respectively, and $(9,000) and $472,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.

Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units

All Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units awarded under the 2004 Plan and the 2001 Directors Plan are recorded at the Company’s closing stock price on the date of grant. Restricted Stock awards and Restricted Stock Units generally vest over a period of three to five years. Performance Share Units generally cliff-vest at the end of a three year performance period. Performance Share Units are a form of stock-based award in which the number of shares ultimately received depends on the Company’s performance against specified financial performance metrics over a three year period. At the end of the performance period, the number of shares of stock issued will be determined based upon the Company’s performance against those metrics.

The Company recorded $210,000 and $958,000 of compensation expense relating to Restricted Stock awards during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and $504,000 and $1,227,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. In connection with shares underlying Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units, the Company recorded compensation expense of $390,000 and $1,129,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and $341,000 and $654,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.

The table below summarizes the total number of Restricted Stock shares and shares underlying Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units granted to certain employee participants and directors during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, as well as the related weighted average grant date fair value for each type of award (number of shares are in thousands):

 

    # of Shares Granted  

Weighted Average

Grant-Date Fair Value

   

Three Months Ended

September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

 

Three Months Ended

September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

        2007           2006           2007           2006           2007           2006           2007           2006    

Restricted Stock Awards

  —     12   —     166   $ —     $ 12.66   $ —     $ 14.91

Restricted Stock Units

  10   —     264   52   $ 16.31   $ —     $ 14.77   $ 14.38

Performance Share Units

  —     12   —     154   $ —     $ 12.66   $ —     $ 14.90

 

20


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

The fair value of nonvested Restricted Stock awards, Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units (collectively “nonvested shares”) is determined based on the closing trading price of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date. A summary of the Company’s nonvested share activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 is as follows (in thousands, except fair value amounts):

 

Restricted Stock,

Restricted Stock Units and

Performance Share Units

   Shares    

Weighted-Average

Grant-Date

Fair Value

Nonvested at January 1, 2007

   1,086     $ 12.42

Granted

   264     $ 14.77

Vested

   (7 )   $ 15.23

Forfeited

   (27 )   $ 15.00
        

Nonvested at September 30, 2007

   1,316     $ 12.82
        

At September 30, 2007, there was $8,143,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested shares granted to both employees and non-employees under the Company’s share-based payment plans, of which $7,641,000 relates to Restricted Stock awards and Restricted Stock Units and $502,000 relates to Performance Share Units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. The amount of unrecognized compensation expense noted above does not necessarily represent the amount that will ultimately be realized by the Company in its statement of operations due to the application of forfeiture rates as well as the possibility that the Company will not be able to meet certain performance requirements on Performance Share Units.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On February 1, 2006, the Company amended and restated the Callaway Golf Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) to eliminate the look-back provision. Under the amended and restated plan, participating employees authorize the Company to withhold compensation and to use the withheld amounts to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at 85% of the closing price on the last day of each six month offering period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company purchased on behalf of participating employees approximately 201,000 and 303,000 shares of common stock, respectively, under the ESPP, and recorded compensation expense of $364,000 and $452,000, respectively. As of September 30, 2007, there were 3,160,000 shares reserved for future issuance under the ESPP.

 

21


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Employee Share-Based Compensation Expense

The table below summarizes the amounts recognized in the financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 for share-based compensation related to employees (in thousands).

 

    

Three Months

Ended September 30,

   

Nine Months

Ended September 30,

 
         2007             2006             2007             2006      

Cost of sales

   $ 142     $ 118     $ 329     $ 380  

Operating expenses

     1,552       2,270       5,299       6,940  
                                

Total cost of employee share-based compensation included in income, before income tax

     1,694       2,388       5,628       7,320  

Amount of income tax recognized in earnings

     (499 )     (807 )     (1,715 )     (2,434 )
                                

Amount charged against net income

   $ 1,195     $ 1,581     $ 3,913     $ 4,886  
                                

Impact on net income per common share:

        

Basic

   $ (0.02 )   $ (0.03 )   $ (0.06 )   $ (0.07 )

Diluted

   $ (0.02 )   $ (0.03 )   $ (0.06 )   $ (0.07 )

In addition, the Company recorded expense of $2,445,000 and $2,289,000 for Restricted Stock awards granted to certain non-employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively and $895,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2006. During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company reversed $148,000 of compensation expense to revalue shares of Restricted Stock granted to non-employees at market value as of September 30, 2007. There were no amounts relating to employee share-based compensation capitalized in inventory during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.

10. Earnings per Share

A reconciliation of the weighted-average shares used in the basic and diluted earnings per common share computations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 is presented below (in thousands):

 

    

Three Months Ended

September 30,

  

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

         2007            2006            2007            2006    

Weighted-average shares outstanding:

           

Weighted-average shares outstanding—Basic

   66,516    67,000    67,250    67,980

Dilutive securities

   1,123    —      1,157    797
                   

Weighted-average shares outstanding—Diluted

   67,639    67,000    68,407    68,777
                   

Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue Common Stock were exercised or converted into Common Stock. Options with an exercise price in excess of the average market value of the Company’s Common Stock during the period have been excluded from the calculation as their effect would be antidilutive. Additionally, potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation of earnings per share in periods in which a net loss is reported, as their effect would be antidilutive. Thus, weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted is the same as weighted average shares outstanding—basic in periods in which a loss is reported. For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, options outstanding totaling 2,593,000 and 8,643,000 shares, respectively, were excluded from the calculations, as their effect would have been antidilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, options outstanding totaling 2,987,000 and 6,571,000 shares, respectively, were excluded from the calculations, as their effect would have been antidilutive.

 

22


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

11. Derivatives and Hedging

The Company from time to time uses derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates. The derivative instruments are accounted for pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS Nos. 138 and 149, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities” and SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments.” As amended, SFAS No. 133 requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet, measure those instruments at fair value and recognize changes in the fair value of derivatives in earnings in the period of change unless the derivative qualifies as an effective hedge that offsets certain exposures.

Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts

The Company from time to time enters into foreign exchange contracts to hedge against exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Such contracts are designated at inception to the related foreign currency exposures being hedged, which include anticipated intercompany sales of inventory denominated in foreign currencies, payments due on intercompany transactions from certain wholly owned foreign subsidiaries, and anticipated sales by the Company’s wholly owned European subsidiary for certain Euro-denominated transactions. Hedged transactions are denominated primarily in British Pounds, Euros, Japanese Yen, Korean Won, Canadian Dollars and Australian Dollars. To achieve hedge accounting, contracts must reduce the foreign currency exchange rate risk otherwise inherent in the amount and duration of the hedged exposures and comply with established risk management policies. Pursuant to its foreign exchange hedging policy, the Company may hedge anticipated transactions and the related receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies using forward foreign currency exchange rate contracts and put or call options. Foreign currency derivatives are used only to meet the Company’s objectives of minimizing variability in the Company’s operating results arising from foreign exchange rate movements which may include derivatives that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting. The Company does not enter into foreign exchange contracts for speculative purposes. Hedging contracts mature within 12 months from their inception.

At September 30, 2007 and 2006, the notional amounts of the Company’s foreign exchange contracts used to hedge outstanding balance sheet exposures were approximately $39,416,000 and $38,669,000, respectively. The Company estimates the fair values of derivatives based on quoted market prices or pricing models using current market rates, and records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in the statement of operations. At September 30, 2007, the fair values of foreign currency-related derivatives were recorded as current liabilities of $2,045,000. The gains and losses on foreign currency contracts used to manage balance sheet exposures are recognized as a component of other income (expense) in the same period as the remeasurement gain and loss of the related foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities and thus generally offset these gains and losses. During the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded a net loss of $2,933,000 and a net gain of $832,000, respectively, due to net realized and unrealized gains and losses on contracts used to manage balance sheet exposures that do not qualify for hedge accounting. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded net losses of $5,528,000 and $2,352,000, respectively, due to net realized and unrealized gains and losses on contracts used to manage balance sheet exposures that do not qualify for hedge accounting. As of September 30, 2007 and 2006, there were no foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges.

 

23


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

12. Segment Information

The Company has two operating segments that are organized on the basis of products, which are segregated between golf clubs and golf balls. The golf clubs segment consists primarily of Callaway Golf, Top-Flite and Ben Hogan woods, hybrids, irons, wedges and putters as well as Odyssey putters, other golf-related accessories and royalties from licensing of the Company’s trademarks and service marks as well as sales of pre-owed golf clubs. The golf balls segment consists primarily of Callaway Golf, Top-Flite and Ben Hogan golf balls. There are no significant intersegment transactions.

The table below contains information utilized by management to evaluate its operating segments for the interim periods presented (in thousands).

 

    

Three Months Ended

September 30,

   

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

 
         2007             2006             2007             2006      

Net sales

        

Golf clubs

   $ 186,504     $ 151,063     $ 775,468     $ 670,490  

Golf balls

     49,045       42,700       174,705       167,533  
                                
   $ 235,549     $ 193,763     $ 950,173     $ 838,023  
                                

Income before provision for income taxes

        

Golf clubs

   $ 16,689     $ 6,570     $ 156,213     $ 101,931  

Golf balls

     (2,757 )     (8,717 )     8,244       (1,781 )

Reconciling items(1)

     (11,833 )     (15,844 )     (47,610 )     (44,010 )
                                
   $ 2,099     $ (17,991 )   $ 116,847     $ 56,140  
                                

Additions to long-lived assets

        

Golf clubs

   $ 4,421     $ 5,714     $ 18,791     $ 16,628  

Golf balls

     1,111       2,817       4,218       12,366  
                                
   $ 5,532     $ 8,531     $ 23,009     $ 28,994  
                                

(1) Represents corporate general and administrative expenses and other income (expense) not utilized by management in determining segment profitability.

13. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). This new standard provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities and information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. This framework is intended to provide increased consistency in how fair value determinations are made under various existing accounting standards which permit, or in some cases require, estimates of fair market value. SFAS 157 also expands financial statement disclosure requirements about a company’s use of fair value measurements, including the effect of such measures on earnings. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. While the Company is currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 157, the adoption is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

24


CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 allows the irrevocable election of fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for certain financial assets and liabilities and other items on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Changes in fair value would be reflected in earnings as they occur. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating if it will elect the fair value option for any of its eligible financial instruments and other items.

In May 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FIN 48-1 Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FSP FIN 48-1”). FSP FIN 48-1 provides guidance on how to determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. FSP FIN 48-1 is effective retroactively to January 1, 2007. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In June 2007, the FASB ratified EITF 06-11 “Accounting for the Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 provides that tax benefits associated with dividends on share-based payment awards be recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital. EITF 06-11 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of EITF 06-11 on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

25


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this report. See also “Important Notice to Investors” on page 2 of this report.

Overview of Business and Seasonality

The Company designs, manufactures and sells high quality golf clubs and golf balls and also sells golf footwear, golf bags and other golf related accessories. The Company designs its products to be technologically-advanced and in this regard invests a considerable amount in research and development each year. The Company’s products are designed for golfers of all skill levels, both amateur and professional.

The Company has two operating segments that are organized on the basis of products, which are segregated between golf clubs and golf balls. The golf clubs segment consists primarily of Callaway Golf, Top-Flite and Ben Hogan woods, hybrids, irons, wedges and putters as well as Odyssey putters. This segment also includes other golf-related accessories described above and royalties from licensing of the Company’s trademarks and service marks as well as sales of pre-owed golf clubs. The golf balls segment consists primarily of Callaway Golf, Top-Flite and Ben Hogan golf balls. As discussed below and in Note 12 to the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements, the Company’s operating segments exclude a significant amount of corporate and general administrative expenses and other income (expense) not utilized by management in determining segment profitability. While the Company’s golf clubs segment has been profitable, the Company’s golf balls segment has reported operating losses on an annual basis. These losses include charges related to the integration of the Callaway Golf and Top-Flite golf ball operations acquired in September 2003 (the “Top-Flite Integration Initiatives”), a portion of the charges for the company-wide restructuring initiatives announced in September 2005 (the “2005 Restructuring Initiatives”) and charges related to the cost reduction initiatives that target gross margin improvements announced in during the fourth quarter of 2006 (“the Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives”). These losses have decreased significantly from a high of $52.7 million in 2003 (including charges of $24.1 million for the Top-Flite Integration Initiatives) to $6.4 million in 2006 (including charges of $2.9 million, $1.0 million and $1.9 million for the Top-Flite Integration Initiatives, the 2005 Restructuring Initiatives and the Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives, respectively). As previously announced, the Company has taken action to address the profitability of its golf ball business, including a re-launch of the Top-Flite brand in 2007, which included among other things the launch of the new D2 golf ball, an updated brand logo as well as an aggressive marketing campaign.

In most of the Company’s key markets, the game of golf is played primarily on a seasonal basis. Weather conditions generally restrict golf from being played year-round, except in a few small markets, with many of the Company’s on-course customers closing for the cold weather months. The Company’s business is therefore also subject to seasonal fluctuations. In general, during the first quarter, the Company begins selling its products into the golf retail channel for the new golf season. This initial sell-in generally continues into the second quarter. The Company’s second quarter sales are also significantly affected by the amount of re-order business of the products sold during the first quarter. The Company’s third quarter sales are generally dependent on re-order business but are generally less than the second quarter as many retailers begin decreasing their inventory levels in anticipation of the end of the golf season. The Company’s fourth quarter sales are generally less than the other quarters due to the end of the golf season in many of the Company’s key markets. This seasonality, and therefore quarter to quarter fluctuations, can be affected by many factors, including the timing of new product introductions. In general, however, because of this seasonality, a majority of the Company’s sales and most, if not all, of its profitability generally occurs during the first half of the year.

 

26


Consolidated Results of Operations

Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

As discussed above, the Company’s net sales for the third quarter generally represent re-orders of the Company’s products from the golf retail channel, which tends to decrease from the first and second quarters as retailers begin decreasing their inventory levels in anticipation of the end of the golf season. Re-orders during the third quarter were primarily comprised of the Company’s new products for 2007, which included more premium products with higher average selling prices than in the same period of 2006. This increase in premium product introductions contributed to a $41.8 million (22%) increase in net sales to $235.5 million for the third quarter of 2007, as compared to $193.8 million in the same period in the prior year.

Net sales information by product category is summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
   Growth (Decline)  
         2007            2006        Dollars     Percent  

Net sales:

          

Woods

   $ 56.2    $ 43.7    $ 12.5     29 %

Irons(1)

     65.4      53.0      12.4     23 %

Putters

     21.6      23.0      (1.4 )   (6 )%

Golf balls

     49.0      42.7      6.3     15 %

Accessories and other(1)

     43.3      31.4      11.9     38 %
                        
   $ 235.5    $ 193.8    $ 41.7     22 %
                        

(1) Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

The $12.5 million (29%) increase in net sales of woods to $56.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 is primarily attributable to an increase in average selling prices combined with an increase in unit volume compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in average selling prices and unit volume is primarily a result of significant re-orders from the Company’s retailers during the third quarter of 2007 of two premium multi-material drivers and one titanium driver that were introduced during the first quarter of 2007.

The $12.4 million (23%) increase in net sales of irons to $65.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 resulted from an increase in unit volume partially offset by a decrease in average selling prices compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in unit volume is primarily due to an increase in sales of X-Series irons products that were launched during the first quarter of 2007. This increase was partially offset by a decline in sales of the Company’s older irons products which were in the second and third years of their product lifecycles. The increase in unit volume was partially offset by a decrease in average selling prices due to a reduction in average selling prices of some of the Company’s older irons products.

Net sales of putters decreased slightly (6%) to $21.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as a result of a decrease in unit volume partially offset by an increase in average selling prices compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease in unit volume was due to a decline in sales of the Company’s older White Steel and Tri-ball putter models, which were in the second and third years of their product lifecycles. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in average selling prices primarily attributable to the current year introduction of the White Hot XG and Black Series putter product lines.

The $6.3 million (15%) increase in net sales of golf balls to $49.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 is primarily due an increase in unit volume combined with a slight increase in average selling prices. Unit volumes increased for both the Callaway Golf and Top-Flite golf balls due to favorable consumer acceptance of the Company’s current year product introductions, including the new Callaway Golf

 

27


2007 HX Hot, Big Bertha and Warbird golf ball product lines and the Top-Flite D2 golf ball. The slight increase in average selling prices is due to a favorable shift in product mix as a result of increased unit sales of higher priced Top-Flite golf balls compared to the same period of the prior year. Additionally, in 2006, the Company had reduced the selling prices of certain products related to initiatives to clear existing Top-Flite golf ball inventory in preparation of the 2007 re-launch of the Top-Flite brand.

The $11.9 million (38%) increase in sales of accessories and other products to $43.3 million is primarily attributable to an increase in sales of Callaway Golf footwear and other accessories (primarily bags and gloves).

Net sales information by region is summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
   Growth (Decline)  
         2007            2006        Dollars    Percent  

Net sales:

           

United States

   $ 124.3    $ 103.2    $ 21.1    20 %

Europe

     41.0      29.2      11.8    40 %

Japan

     25.2      23.2      2.0    9 %

Rest of Asia

     20.5      18.3      2.2    12 %

Other foreign countries

     24.5      19.9      4.6    23 %
                       
   $ 235.5    $ 193.8    $ 41.7    22 %
                       

Net sales in the United States increased $21.1 million (20%) to $124.3 million during the third quarter of 2007 compared to the same period in the prior year. The Company’s sales in regions outside of the United States increased $20.6 million (23%) to $111.2 million during the third quarter of 2007 compared to the same quarter in 2006, primarily due to a $11.8 million increase in sales in Europe. These increases in net sales in both the U.S. and Europe are attributable to favorable consumer acceptance of the Company’s current products. The Company’s 2007 net sales were also positively affected during the period by changes in foreign currency rates primarily in Europe, Canada, Australia and Korea, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency rate changes in Japan.

For the third quarter of 2007, gross profit increased $26.3 million to $94.0 million from $67.7 million in the third quarter of 2006. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales improved to 40% in the third quarter of 2007 from 35% in the comparable period of 2006. Overall gross margins were favorably impacted during the third quarter of 2007 by increases in average selling prices, as discussed above, combined with improved manufacturing efficiencies, a decline in freight costs and other Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives. Gross profit for the third quarter of 2007 was negatively affected by charges of $4.1 million related to the implementation of the Company’s Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives. Gross profit for the third quarter of 2006 was negatively affected by charges of $1.2 million related to the Top-Flite Integration Initiatives.

Selling expenses increased $8.9 million (16%) to $65.8 million in the third quarter of 2007 as compared to $56.9 million in the same period of 2006. As a percentage of sales, selling expenses decreased to 28% in the third quarter of 2007 compared to 29% in the third quarter of 2006. The dollar increase in selling expenses was primarily due to a $4.3 million increase in employee costs primarily related to incentive compensation and commissions as a result of the Company’s improved financial performance, a $3.7 million increase in advertising and marketing expenses and a $1.2 million increase in depreciation expense as a result of an increase in displays and shelving fixtures as well as golf fitting carts acquired during 2007.

 

28


General and administrative expenses decreased $1.5 million (7%) to $19.4 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to $20.9 million in the same period of 2006. As a percentage of sales, general and administrative expenses decreased to 8% in the third quarter of 2007 from 11% in the third quarter of 2006. The dollar decrease was primarily due to a $3.8 million gain recognized in August 2007 in connection with the sale of a building. Partially offsetting this decrease are increases of $1.7 million in legal expenses associated with intellectual property rights litigation combined with a $0.7 million increase in employee costs primarily related to incentive compensation as a result of the Company’s improved financial performance.

Research and development expenses increased $1.1 million (16%) to $7.9 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to $6.8 million in the comparable period of 2006. As a percentage of sales, research and development expenses decreased to 3% for the third quarter of 2007 compared to 4% for the comparable period in 2006. The dollar increase was primarily due to a $0.8 million increase in employee costs primarily related to incentive compensation as a result of the Company’s improved financial performance.

Other income increased $2.3 million in the third quarter of 2007 from net expense of $1.1 million in the comparable period of 2006. The increase in other income is primarily attributable to a $1.1 million decrease in interest expense due to the fact that the Company paid-off its line of credit as of September 30, 2007, a $0.8 million increase in net foreign currency fluctuation gains as well as a $0.4 million net gain recognized in connection with favorable changes in the asset value of the Company’s deferred compensation plan during the third quarter of 2007 compared to the same period of the prior year.

The effective tax rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 was 40% compared to 34% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The change in the effective tax rate is primarily due to differences year-over-year in the Company’s annual estimated pre-tax income and the relative impact of permanent differences on pre-tax income. When the Company’s annual estimated income tax rate changes, the year-to-date effect of the change is recorded in the current period, which can cause fluctuations in effective tax rates in interim periods. During the third quarter of 2006, the Company revised its forecast of earnings for the year which had the effect of significantly reducing the effective tax rate on the loss incurred for the quarter

Net income for the third quarter of 2007 improved to $1.3 million from a net loss of $11.9 million in the comparable period of 2006. Diluted earnings per share improved to $0.02 per share in the third quarter of 2007 compared to a loss of $0.18 per share in the third quarter of 2006. Net income for the third quarter of 2007 was positively impacted by an after-tax gain of $2.3 million ($0.03 per share) that was recognized in connection with the sale of a building in August 2007. Net income for the third quarter of 2007 was negatively impacted by after-tax charges of $2.5 million ($0.04 per share) related to costs associated with the Company’s Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives. Net income for the third quarter of 2006 was negatively impacted by after-tax charges of $0.7 million ($0.01 per share) related to the Company’s 2005 Restructuring Initiatives as well as after-tax charges of $0.8 million ($0.01 per share) in connection with the Top-Flite Integration Initiatives.

Golf Club and Golf Ball Segments Results for the Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

Net sales information by operating segment is summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
   Growth (Decline)  
         2007            2006        Dollars    Percent  

Net sales

           

Golf clubs

   $ 186.5    $ 151.1    $ 35.4    23 %

Golf balls

     49.0      42.7      6.3    3 %
                       
   $ 235.5    $ 193.8    $ 41.7    22 %
                       

 

29


Profitability by operating segment is summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
    Growth (Decline)  
         2007             2006         Dollars    Percent  

Income before provision for income taxes(1)

         

Golf clubs

   $ 16.7     $ 6.6     $ 10.1    153 %

Golf balls

     (2.8 )     (8.7 )     5.9    68 %
                         
   $ 13.9 (1)   $ (2.1 )(1)   $ 16.0    762 %
                         

(1) Amounts shown are before the deduction of corporate general and administrative expenses and other income (expense) of $11.8 million and $15.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, not utilized by management in determining segment profitability. For further information on segment reporting see Note 12 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements—”Segment Information” in this Form 10-Q.

The improvement in net sales for the golf club operating segment is primarily attributable to a $12.5 million (29%) increase in net sales of woods, a $12.4 million (23%) increase in net sales of irons as well as an $11.9 million (38%) increase in net sales of accessories and other products. As discussed above, the increase in net sales of woods is primarily due to significant re-orders from the Company’s retailers during the third quarter of 2007 of two premium multi-material drivers and one titanium driver that were introduced during the first quarter of 2007. The increase in net sales of irons is primarily due to an increase in unit volume of premium irons products that were launched during the first quarter of 2007 partially offset by a decline in sales of the Company’s older irons products which were in the second and third years of their product lifecycles. The increase in net sales of accessories and other products is attributable to an increase in sales of Callaway Golf footwear and other accessories, primarily bags and gloves.

The improvement in net sales for the golf ball segment is primarily due to an increase in unit volume combined with a slight increase in average selling prices. Unit volumes increased for both the Callaway Golf and Top-Flite golf balls due to favorable consumer acceptance of the Company’s current year product introductions, including the new Callaway Golf 2007 HX Hot, Big Bertha and Warbird golf ball product lines and the Top-Flite D2 golf ball. The increase in average selling prices is due to a favorable shift in product mix as a result of increased unit sales of higher priced Top-Flite golf balls compared to the same period of the prior year. Additionally, in 2006, the Company had reduced the selling prices of certain products related to initiatives to clear Top-Flite golf ball inventory in preparation for the 2007 re-launch of the Top-Flite brand.

Pre-tax income (loss) in the Company’s golf clubs and golf balls operating segments improved to income of $16.7 million and a loss of $2.8 million, respectively, for the third quarter of 2007 compared to income of $6.6 million and a loss of $8.7 million, respectively, for the same period in 2006. The increase in the golf clubs operating segment pre-tax income is primarily attributable to improved net sales as well as improved gross margins resulting from a more favorable club product mix due to the current year launch of higher margin driver and irons products. The increase in the golf balls operating segment pre-tax income is primarily due to improved net sales as well as improved gross margins resulting from a shift in product mix toward increased sales of more premium Callaway branded golf balls and the introduction of a higher-priced Top-Flite branded golf ball combined with a decline in sales of lower margin range balls. In addition, both golf clubs and golf balls operating segments were favorably impacted by cost reductions resulting from improved manufacturing efficiencies, declines in freight costs and the successful implementation of the Company’s Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives during the quarter ended September 30, 2007.

As noted in “Overview of Business and Seasonality” above, during 2006 the Company incurred charges in connection with the 2005 Restructuring Initiatives and the Top-Flite Integration Initiatives. The Company’s income before provision for income taxes for the golf clubs and golf balls operating segments includes the

 

30


recognition of charges in connection with these initiatives in the amounts of $0.6 million and $3.6 million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2006. In connection with the 2005 Restructuring Initiatives and the Company’s Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives, the Company’s golf clubs and golf balls operating segments incurred charges of $1.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2007.

Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

Net sales increased $112.2 million (13%) to $950.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $838.0 million for the comparable period in the prior year. The overall increase in net sales is primarily due to a $44.0 million (19%) increase in net sales of woods, a $39.9 million (35%) increase in net sales of accessories and other products and an $18.1 million (7%) increase in net sales of irons.

Net sales information by product category is summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

 

     Nine Months Ended
September 30,
   Growth (Decline)  
         2007            2006        Dollars    Percent  

Net sales:

           

Woods

   $ 271.2    $ 227.2    $ 44.0    19 %

Irons(1)

     260.8      242.7      18.1    7 %

Putters

     88.1      85.1      3.0    4 %

Golf balls

     174.7      167.5      7.2    4 %

Accessories and other(1)

     155.4      115.5      39.9    35 %
                       
   $ 950.2    $ 838.0    $ 112.2    13 %
                       

(1) Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

The $44.0 million (19%) increase in net sales of woods to $271.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 is primarily attributable to an increase in average selling prices partially offset by lower unit volume during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in average selling prices is primarily attributable to a favorable shift in product mix as a result of the launch of two premium multi-material drivers and one titanium driver introduced during the first quarter of 2007, partially offset by a decrease in average selling prices for woods products that were in the second and third years of their product lifecycles. The slight decline in unit volume resulted from a decrease in unit volume of older fairway wood products which were in the second year of their product lifecycles almost entirely offset by an increase in unit volume of new driver products due to the timing of product introductions.

The $18.1 million (7%) increase in net sales of irons to $260.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 resulted primarily from higher unit volume combined with an increase in average selling prices compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in unit volume is primarily attributable to an increase in sales of X-Series irons products that were launched during the first quarter of 2007 partially offset by a decrease in sales of the Company’s older irons products, which were in the second and third years of their product lifecycles. The increase in average selling prices is attributable to a more favorable mix of higher priced irons products as a result of the introduction of more premium irons products during 2007 as compared to 2006.

The $3.0 million (4%) increase in net sales of putters to $88.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 resulted primarily from an increase in average selling prices offset by lower unit volume in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in average selling prices is attributable to the current year introduction of the White Hot XG and Black Series putter product lines. The decrease in unit volume is primarily due to decreases in sales of the Company’s older White Steel and Tri-ball putter products, which were in the second and third years of their product lifecycles.

 

31


The $7.2 million (4%) increase in net sales of golf balls to $174.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 is primarily due to an increase in unit volume of Callaway Golf balls, partially offset by a decrease in unit volume of Top-Flite golf balls. The increase in unit volume for the Callaway Golf balls is attributable to favorable consumer acceptance of the Company’s current year product introductions, including the new 2007 HX Hot, Big Bertha and Warbird golf ball product lines. The decrease in unit volume for Top-Flite golf balls is primarily due to a 30% reduction in product SKUs combined with a decline in sales of the Company’s older Top-Flite brand golf balls products that were in the second and third years of their product lifecycles, partially offset by net sales of the D2 golf ball introduced in the current year.

The $39.9 million (35%) increase in sales of accessories and other products to $155.4 million is primarily attributable to an increase in sales of Callaway Golf footwear and other accessories (primarily bags and gloves). The increase in sales of Callaway Golf footwear was primarily due to an increase in unit volume as well as the fact that golf footwear was sold primarily through a licensing arrangement until April of 2006 whereas the Company sold golf footwear directly to retailers during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Net sales information by region is summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

 

     Nine Months Ended
September 30,
   Growth (Decline)  
         2007            2006        Dollars    Percent  

Net sales:

           

United States

   $ 512.5    $ 470.8    $ 41.7    9 %

Europe

     167.3      133.6      33.7    25 %

Japan

     96.9      83.4      13.5    16 %

Rest of Asia

     69.0      60.8      8.2    13 %

Other foreign countries

     104.5      89.4      15.1    17 %
                       
   $ 950.2    $ 838.0    $ 112.2    13 %
                       

Net sales in the United States increased $41.7 million (9%) to $512.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in the prior year. The Company’s sales in regions outside of the United States increased $70.5 million (19%) to $437.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. This increase in U.S. and international sales is attributable to increased sales in all regions primarily due to favorable consumer acceptance of the Company’s new products. The Company’s net sales were positively affected during the first nine months of 2007 by changes in foreign currency rates, primarily in Europe, Australia, Korea and Canada, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency rate changes in Japan.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, gross profit increased $90.6 million (27%) to $429.9 million from $339.3 million in the comparable period of 2006. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales improved to 45% during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from 40% in the comparable period of 2006. Overall gross margins during the first nine months of 2007 were favorably impacted by increases in average selling prices, as discussed above, combined with improved manufacturing efficiencies, a decline in freight costs and other Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives. Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was negatively affected by charges of $7.5 million related to the implementation of the Company’s Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives. Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was negatively affected by charges of $3.4 million related to the Top-Flite Integration Initiatives, as well as $0.2 million in connection with the Company’s 2005 Restructuring Initiatives.

Selling expenses increased $19.9 million (10%) to $222.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $202.1 million in the comparable period of 2006. As a percentage of net sales, selling expense decreased to 23% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, from 24% for the comparable period

 

32


of 2006. The dollar increase was primarily due to a $9.5 million increase in employee costs primarily related to incentive compensation and commissions as a result of the Company’s improved financial performance. In addition, marketing and advertising expenses increased $5.7 million primarily due to expenditures associated with current year new product introductions as well as the previously announced re-launch of the Top-Flite brand, and depreciation expense increased $1.9 million as a result of an increase in displays and shelving fixtures as well as golf fitting carts acquired during 2007.

General and administrative expenses increased $5.9 million (10%) to $65.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $59.2 million in the comparable period of 2006. As a percentage of sales, general and administrative expenses remained consistent at 7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. The dollar increase was due to a $4.4 million increase in employee costs primarily related to incentive compensation as a result of the Company’s improved financial performance, a $3.8 million increase in corporate legal expense associated with intellectual property rights litigation and a $1.5 million increase in professional fees primarily related to consulting services. These increases were partially offset by a $3.8 million gain recognized in connection with the sale of a building in August 2007.

Research and development expenses increased $4.1 million (21%) to $23.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $19.8 million in the comparable period of 2006. As a percentage of sales, research and development expenses increased to 3% from 2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The dollar increase was primarily due to a $2.9 million increase in employee costs primarily related to incentive compensation as a result of the Company’s improved financial performance combined with an increase in research and development personnel during 2007.

Other net expense remained relatively consistent at $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. However, net foreign currency fluctuation gains decreased by $0.3 million and interest expense increased by $0.2 million as a result of higher outstanding borrowings and interest rates under the Company’s line of credit during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Offsetting these increases in other net expense is a net gain of $0.5 million due to favorable changes in the asset value of the Company’s deferred compensation plan.

The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was 39% compared to 40% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The slight decrease in tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 resulted from increased estimated annual domestic manufacturing tax benefits and research and development tax credits, partially offset by an increase in the state income tax rate due to recent state law changes.

Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 improved 111% to $70.7 million from net income of $33.5 million in the comparable period of 2006. The diluted earnings per share improved 110% to $1.03 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to diluted earnings per share of $0.49 in the comparable period of 2006. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was positively impacted by an after-tax gain of $2.3 million ($0.03 per share) that was recognized in connection with the sale of a building in August 2007. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was negatively impacted by after-tax charges of $4.6 million ($0.07 per share) related to costs associated with the Company’s Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was negatively impacted by after-tax charges of $2.5 million ($0.04 per share) related to the Top-Flite Integration Initiatives as well as after-tax charges of $1.0 million ($0.01 per share) in connection with the Company’s 2005 Restructuring Initiatives.

 

33


Golf Club and Golf Ball Segments Results for the Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

Net sales information by operating segment is summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

 

    

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

   Growth (Decline)  
         2007            2006        Dollars    Percent  

Net sales

           

Golf clubs

   $ 775.5    $ 670.5    $ 105.0    16 %

Golf balls

     174.7      167.5      7.2    4 %
                       
   $ 950.2    $ 838.0    $ 112.2    13 %
                       

Profitability by operating segment is summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

 

    

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

    Growth (Decline)  
         2007             2006         Dollars    Percent  

Income before provision for income taxes(1)

         

Golf clubs

   $ 156.2     $ 101.9     $ 54.3    53 %

Golf balls

     8.2       (1.8 )     10.0    556 %
                         
   $ 164.4 (1)   $ 100.1 (1)   $ 64.3    64 %
                         

(1) Amounts shown are before the deduction of corporate general and administration expenses and other income (expenses) of $47.6 million and $44.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which are not utilized by management in determining segment profitability. For further information on segment reporting see Note 12 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements—”Segment Information” in this Form 10-Q.

The improvement in net sales for the golf club operating segment is primarily attributable to a $44.0 million (19%) increase in net sales of woods, a $39.9 million (35%) increase in net sales of accessories and other products, an $18.1 million (7%) increase in net sales of irons and a $3.0 million (4%) increase in net sales of putters. As discussed above, the increase in net sales of woods is primarily due to strong driver sales, including sales of two premium multi-material drivers and one new titanium driver that were introduced during the first quarter of 2007. The increase in net sales of accessories and other products is attributable to an increase in sales of Callaway Golf footwear and other accessories, primarily bags and gloves. The increase in net sales of irons is primarily due to an increase in sales of premium irons products that were launched during the first quarter of 2007 partially offset by a decrease in sales of the Company’s older irons products, which were in the second and third years of their product lifecycles. The increase in net sales of putters is primarily attributable to an increase in average selling prices as a result of the current year introduction of the White Hot XG and Black Series putter product lines, partially offset by a decrease in unit volume as a result of decreases in the Company’s older White Steel and Tri-ball putter products, which were in the second and third years of their product lifecycles.

The improvement in net sales for the golf ball segment is primarily due to an increase in unit volume of Callaway Golf balls as a result of favorable consumer acceptance of the Company’s current year product introductions, including the new 2007 HX Hot, Big Bertha, and Warbird golf ball product lines. This increase is partially offset by a decrease in unit volume of Top-Flite golf balls as a result of a 30% reduction in product SKUs combined with a decline in sales of the Company’s older golf balls products that were in the second and third years of their product lifecycles, partially offset by net sales of the D2 golf ball introduced in the current year.

Pre-tax income (loss) in the Company’s golf clubs and golf balls operating segments improved to $156.2 million and $8.2 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to income of

 

34


$101.9 million and a loss of $1.8 million, respectively, for the same period in 2006. The increase in the golf clubs operating segment pre-tax income is primarily attributable to an increase in net sales as well as a more favorable product mix due to the current year launch of higher margin driver and irons products. The increase in the golf balls operating segment pre-tax income is primarily due to a shift in product mix toward increased sales of more premium Callaway branded golf balls and the introduction of a higher-priced Top-Flite branded golf ball combined with a decline in sales of lower margin range balls during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company recorded a $3.3 million charge due to a work-in-progress inventory write-down as a result of an annual physical inventory count. Furthermore, both golf clubs and golf balls operating segment margins were favorably impacted by cost reductions resulting from improved manufacturing efficiencies, declines in freight costs and the successful implementation of the Company’s Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives during 2007.

As previously mentioned in the overview above, during 2006 the Company incurred charges in connection with the 2005 Restructuring Initiatives and the Top-Flite Integration Initiatives. The Company’s income before provision for income taxes for the golf clubs and golf balls operating segments includes the recognition of charges in connection with these initiatives in the amounts of $0.6 million and $3.6 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. In connection with the Company’s Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives announced during the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company’s golf clubs and golf balls operating segments absorbed charges of $4.6 million and $2.9 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Financial Condition

Cash and cash equivalents decreased $14.8 million (32%) to $31.6 million at September 30, 2007, from $46.4 million at December 31, 2006. This decrease in cash primarily resulted from cash used in financing activities of $142.6 million as well as cash used in investing activities of $19.9 million offset by cash provided by operating activities of $145.8 million. Cash flows used in financing activities are primarily attributable to $101.4 million of cash paid for the acquisition of Company stock in accordance with the stock repurchase programs authorized in June 2006 and June 2007, net payments of $79.1 million on the Company’s line of credit as well as dividends paid of $14.2 million. These cash outflows were partially offset by cash inflows of $47.7 million related to the issuance of Common Stock primarily due to stock options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Cash flows used in investing activities primarily reflects capital expenditures of $24.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 reflects decreases in inventory of $57.2 million as well as increases in accrued employee compensation and benefits, and accrued income taxes payable of $18.6 million and $11.8 million, respectively. In addition, cash was positively impacted by net income of $70.7 million, adjusted for depreciation and amortization of $27.5 million, stock compensation expense of $8.2 million and $1.4 million of deferred income tax expenses. This positive impact on cash was partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $40.0 million and a decrease in accounts payable of $6.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

As of September 30, 2007, the Company’s net accounts receivable increased $46.9 million to $165.0 million from $118.1 million as of December 31, 2006. The increase in accounts receivable is primarily the result of the general seasonality of the Company’s business (see “Overview of Business and Seasonality” above). The Company’s accounts receivable balance will generally be at its highest during the first and second quarters and decline significantly during the third and fourth quarters as a result of an increase in cash collections. The Company’s net accounts receivable increased $26.6 million as of September 30, 2007 as compared to the Company’s net accounts receivable as of September 30, 2006. This increase is primarily attributable to the increase in sales during the quarter ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period of the prior year.

The Company’s net inventory decreased $51.2 million to $213.9 million as of September 30, 2007 compared to $265.1 million as of December 31, 2006. This decrease is consistent with seasonal trends (see “Overview of Business and Seasonality” above). Generally, the Company’s buildup of inventory levels begins

 

35


during the fourth quarter and continues heavily into the first quarter as well as into the beginning of the second quarter in order to meet demands during the height of the golf season. Inventory levels start to decline toward the end of the second quarter and are at their lowest during the third quarter. The Company’s net inventory decreased $27.8 million as of September 30, 2007 as compared to the Company’s net inventory as of September 30, 2006. This decrease is the result of the Company’s inventory reduction initiatives.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity

The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are cash flows provided by operations and the Company’s credit facilities in effect from time to time. The Company currently expects this to continue. Cash flows from operations combined with borrowings under the Company’s credit facilities are affected by the seasonal fluctuations of the golf business as discussed above (see “Overview and Business Seasonality”). Generally, a significant portion of cash outflows from operations are used to purchase inventory. Cash inflows from operations generally begin to increase during the second quarter and peak during the third quarter as a result of collections from customers. As necessary, the Company uses its credit facilities to supplement its cash inflows from operations as well as for other financing and investing activities, including stock repurchases.

The Company’s primary line of credit is a $250.0 million line of credit with Bank of America, N.A. and certain other lenders party to the Company’s November 5, 2004 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The line of credit was most recently amended effective February 15, 2007, by a Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, the “Line of Credit”), to provide for modification of the financial covenants, the release of all collateral with respect to the obligations under the Line of Credit, the reduction of commitment fee margins and interest rate margins and certain other changes favorable to the Company. The amendment also extends the term of the Line of Credit to February 15, 2012.

The Line of Credit provides for revolving loans of up to $250.0 million, although actual borrowing availability can be effectively limited by the financial covenants contained therein. As of September 30, 2007, the maximum amount that could be borrowed under the Line of Credit was $250.0 million. At September 30, 2007 the Company had no balance outstanding under the Line of Credit and had approximately $0.9 million outstanding under other credit facilities.

Under the Line of Credit, the Company is required to pay certain fees, including an unused commitment fee of between 10.0 to 25.0 basis points per annum of the unused commitment amount, with the exact amount determined based upon the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio and trailing four quarters earnings’ before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, as well as other non-cash expense and income items (EBITDA) (each as defined in the agreement governing the Line of Credit). Outstanding borrowings under the Line of Credit accrue interest, at the Company’s election, based upon the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio and trailing four quarters’ EBITDA of (i) the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 50.0 basis points or (b) Bank of America’s prime rate, or (ii) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the agreement governing the Line of Credit) plus a margin of 50.0 to 125.0 basis points.

The Line of Credit requires the Company to meet certain financial covenants and includes certain other restrictions, including restrictions limiting dividends, stock repurchases, capital expenditures and asset sales. As of September 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with the covenants and other terms of the Line of Credit, as then applicable.

The total origination fees incurred in connection with the Line of Credit, including fees incurred in connection with the amendments, were $2.1 million and are being amortized into interest expense over the remaining term of the Line of Credit agreement. Unamortized origination fees were $1.2 million as of September 30, 2007, of which $0.3 million was included in prepaid and other current assets and $0.9 million in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

 

36


Other Significant Cash and Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes certain significant cash and contractual obligations as of September 30, 2007 that will affect the Company’s future liquidity (in millions):

 

     Payments Due By Period
     Total   

Less Than

1 Year

   1-3 Years    4-5 Years   

More Than

5 Years

Line of credit

   $ 0.9    $ 0.9    $ —      $ —      $ —  

Operating leases(1)

     24.4      7.3      7.6      3.6      5.9

Unconditional purchase obligations(2)

     110.4      59.6      40.0      10.1      0.7

Deferred compensation(3)

     7.7      0.5      0.7      0.3      6.2

Uncertain income tax contingencies(4)

     14.3      0.3      5.1      6.0      2.9

Investment commitments(5)

     0.8      0.8      —        —        —  
                                  

Total(6)

   $ 158.5    $ 69.4    $ 53.4    $ 20.0    $ 15.7
                                  

(1) The Company leases certain warehouse, distribution and office facilities, vehicles and office equipment under operating leases. The amounts presented in this line item represent commitments for minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases.
(2) During the normal course of business, the Company enters into agreements to purchase goods and services, including purchase commitments for production materials, endorsement agreements with professional golfers and other endorsers, employment and consulting agreements, and intellectual property licensing agreements pursuant to which the Company is required to pay royalty fees. It is not possible to determine the amounts the Company will ultimately be required to pay under these agreements as they are subject to many variables including performance-based bonuses, reductions in payment obligations if designated minimum performance criteria are not achieved, and severance arrangements. The amounts listed approximate minimum purchase obligations, base compensation, endorsement agreements with professional golfers and other endorsers and guaranteed minimum royalty payments the Company is obligated to pay under these agreements. The actual amounts paid under some of these agreements may be higher or lower than the amounts included. In the aggregate, the actual amount paid under these obligations is likely to be higher than the amounts listed as a result of the variable nature of these obligations. In addition, the Company also enters into unconditional purchase obligations with various vendors and suppliers of goods and services in the normal course of operations through purchase orders or other documentation or that are undocumented except for an invoice. Such unconditional purchase obligations are generally outstanding for periods less than one year and are settled by cash payments upon delivery of goods and services and are not reflected in this line item.
(3) The Company has an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The deferred compensation plan allows officers, certain other employees and directors of the Company to defer all or part of their compensation, to be paid to the participants or their designated beneficiaries after retirement, death or separation from the Company. To support the deferred compensation plan, the Company has elected to purchase Company-owned life insurance. The cash surrender value of the Company-owned insurance related to deferred compensation is included in other assets and was $9.2 million at September 30, 2007.
(4) As of September 30, 2007, the Company had a net unrecognized tax benefit of $7.5 million. This amount was recorded as a short-term income tax payable of $0.3 million, a long-term income tax payable of $14.0 million and net deferred income tax assets of $6.8 million related to the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). The amount reflected in this table represents the short-term and long-term income tax payables. For further discussion see Note 2 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements—“Income Taxes” in this Form 10-Q.
(5) The amount is in connection with the Company’s investment in Qingdao Suntech Sporting Goods Company Limited. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements—“Investments” in this Form 10-Q.

 

37


(6) During the third quarter of 2001, the Company entered into a derivative commodity instrument to manage electricity costs in the volatile California energy market. The contract was originally effective through May 2006. During the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company notified the energy supplier that, among other things, the energy supplier was in default of the energy supply contract and that based upon such default, and for other reasons, the Company was terminating the energy supply contract. The Company continues to reflect the $19.9 million derivative valuation account on its balance sheet, subject to periodic review, in accordance with SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” The $19.9 million represents unrealized losses resulting from changes in the estimated fair value of the contract and does not represent contractual cash obligations. The Company believes the energy supply contract has been terminated, and therefore, the Company does not have any further cash obligations under the contract. Accordingly, the energy derivative valuation account is not included in the table. There can be no assurance, however, that a party will not assert a future claim against the Company or that a bankruptcy court or arbitrator will not ultimately nullify the Company’s termination of the contract. No provision has been made for contingencies or obligations, if any, under the contract beyond November 2001. For further discussion, see Note 8 to the Company’s Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements—“Supply of Electricity and Energy Contracts” in this Form 10-Q.

During its normal course of business, the Company has made certain indemnities, commitments and guarantees under which it may be required to make payments in relation to certain transactions. These include (i) intellectual property indemnities to the Company’s customers and licensees in connection with the use, sale and/or license of Company products or trademarks, (ii) indemnities to various lessors in connection with facility leases for certain claims arising from such facilities or leases, (iii) indemnities to vendors and service providers pertaining to claims based on the negligence or willful misconduct of the Company and (iv) indemnities involving the accuracy of representations and warranties in certain contracts. In addition, the Company has made contractual commitments to each of its officers and certain other employees providing for severance payments upon the termination of employment. The Company also has consulting agreements that provide for payment of nominal fees upon the issuance of patents and/or the commercialization of research results. The Company has also issued a guarantee in the form of a standby letter of credit as security for contingent liabilities under certain workers’ compensation insurance policies. The duration of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees varies, and in certain cases, may be indefinite. The majority of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees do not provide for any limitation on the maximum amount of future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, costs incurred to settle claims related to indemnities have not been material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In addition, the Company believes the likelihood is remote that material payments will be required under the commitments and guarantees described above. The fair value of indemnities, commitments and guarantees that the Company issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was not material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In addition to the contractual obligations listed above, the Company’s liquidity could also be adversely affected by an unfavorable outcome with respect to claims and litigation that the Company is subject to from time to time. See below “Part II, Item 1—Legal Proceedings.”

Sufficiency of Liquidity

Based upon its current operating plan, analysis of its consolidated financial position and projected future results of operations, the Company believes that its operating cash flows, together with its credit facilities, will be sufficient to finance current operating requirements, planned capital expenditures, contractual obligations and commercial commitments, for at least the next twelve months. There can be no assurance, however, that future industry specific or other developments, general economic trends or other matters will not adversely affect the Company’s operations or its ability to meet its future cash requirements.

 

38


Capital Resources

The Company does not currently have any material commitments for capital expenditures. The Company expects to have capital expenditures of approximately $35 to $40 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. This includes capital expenditures in support of the Company’s normal operations, expenditures associated with the Gross Margin Improvement Initiatives in addition to expenditures in connection with building improvement and consolidation projects.

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not currently have any material relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance-sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, included in our 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, except as follows:

On July 13, 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on an income tax return. Under FIN 48, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant tax authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than 50% likelihood of being sustained. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company uses derivative financial instruments for hedging purposes to limit its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Transactions involving these financial instruments are with creditworthy firms. The use of these instruments exposes the Company to market and credit risk which may at times be concentrated with certain counterparties, although counterparty nonperformance is not anticipated. The Company is also exposed to interest rate risk from its credit facility.

Foreign Currency Fluctuations

In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks (see Note 11 to the Company’s Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements – “ Derivatives and Hedging” in this Form 10-Q) that could impact the Company’s results of operations. The Company’s risk management strategy includes the use of derivative financial instruments, including forwards and purchase options, to hedge certain of these exposures. The Company’s objective is to offset gains and losses resulting from these exposures with gains and losses on the derivative contracts used to hedge them, thereby reducing volatility of earnings. The Company does not enter into any trading or speculative positions with regard to foreign currency related derivative instruments.

The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent primarily in its sales commitments, anticipated sales and assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The Company

 

39


transacts business in 12 currencies worldwide, of which the most significant to its operations are the European currencies, Japanese Yen, Korean Won, Canadian Dollar, and Australian Dollar. For most currencies, the Company is a net receiver of foreign currencies and, therefore, benefits from a weaker U.S. dollar and is adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to those foreign currencies in which the Company transacts significant amounts of business.

The Company enters into foreign exchange contracts to hedge against exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Such contracts are designated at inception to the related foreign currency exposures being hedged, which include anticipated intercompany sales of inventory denominated in foreign currencies, payments due on intercompany transactions from certain wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries, and anticipated sales by the Company’s wholly owned European subsidiary for certain Euro-denominated transactions. Hedged transactions are denominated primarily in European currencies, Japanese Yen, Korean Won, Canadian Dollars and Australian Dollars. To achieve hedge accounting, contracts must reduce the foreign currency exchange rate risk otherwise inherent in the amount and duration of the hedged exposures and comply with established risk management policies. Pursuant to its foreign exchange hedging policy, the Company may hedge anticipated transactions and the related receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies using forward foreign currency exchange rate contracts and put or call options. Foreign currency derivatives are used only to meet the Company’s objectives of minimizing variability in the Company’s operating results arising from foreign exchange rate movements. The Company does not enter into foreign exchange contracts for speculative purposes. Hedging contracts mature within 12 months from their inception.

At September 30, 2007 and 2006, the notional amounts of the Company’s foreign exchange contracts used to hedge outstanding balance sheet exposures were approximately $39.4 million and $38.7 million, respectively. At September 30, 2007 and 2006, there were no outstanding foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges.

As part of the Company’s risk management procedure, a sensitivity analysis model is used to measure the potential loss in future earnings of market-sensitive instruments resulting from one or more selected hypothetical changes in interest rates or foreign currency values. The sensitivity analysis model quantifies the estimated potential effect of unfavorable movements of 10% in foreign currencies to which the Company was exposed at September 30, 2007 through its derivative financial instruments.

The estimated maximum one-day loss from the Company’s foreign currency derivative financial instruments, calculated using the sensitivity analysis model described above, is $4.1 million at September 30, 2007. The portion of the estimated loss associated with the foreign exchange contracts that offset the remeasurement gain and loss of the related foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities is $4.1 million at September 30, 2007 and would impact earnings. The Company believes that such a hypothetical loss from its derivatives would be offset by increases in the value of the underlying transactions being hedged.

The sensitivity analysis model is a risk analysis tool and does not purport to represent actual losses in earnings that will be incurred by the Company, nor does it consider the potential effect of favorable changes in market rates. It also does not represent the maximum possible loss that may occur. Actual future gains and losses will differ from those estimated because of changes or differences in market rates and interrelationships, hedging instruments and hedge percentages, timing and other factors.

Interest Rate Fluctuations

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk from its Line of Credit (see Note 7 to the Company’s Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements—“Financing Arrangements” in this Form 10-Q). Outstanding borrowings under the Line of Credit accrue interest, at the Company’s election, based upon the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio and trailing four quarters’ EBITDA of (i) the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 50.0 basis points or (b) Bank of America’s prime rate, or (ii) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the agreement governing the Line of Credit) plus a margin of 50.0 to 125.0 basis points.

 

40


As part of the Company’s risk management procedures, a sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the impact of unfavorable changes in interest rates on the Company’s cash flows. The sensitivity analysis quantified that the estimated potential cash flows impact would be approximately $0.5 million in additional interest expense if interest rates were to increase by 10% over a three month period.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness, as of September 30, 2007, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

41


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In conjunction with the Company’s program of enforcing its proprietary rights, the Company has initiated or may initiate actions against alleged infringers under the intellectual property laws of various countries, including, for example, the U.S. Lanham Act, the U.S. Patent Act, and other pertinent laws. Defendants in these actions may, among other things, contest the validity and/or the enforceability of some of the Company’s patents and/or trademarks. Others may assert counterclaims against the Company. Historically, these matters individually and in the aggregate have not had a material adverse effect upon the financial position or results of operations of the Company. It is possible, however, that in the future one or more defenses or claims asserted by defendants in one or more of those actions may succeed, resulting in the loss of all or part of the rights under one or more patents, loss of a trademark, a monetary award against the Company or some other material loss to the Company. One or more of these results could adversely affect the Company’s overall ability to protect its product designs and ultimately limit its future success in the marketplace.

In addition, the Company from time to time receives information claiming that products sold by the Company infringe or may infringe patent or other intellectual property rights of third parties. It is possible that one or more claims of potential infringement could lead to litigation, the need to obtain licenses, the need to alter a product to avoid infringement, a settlement or judgment, or some other action or material loss by the Company.

On February 9, 2006, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. C.A. 06-91, asserting claims against Acushnet Company for patent infringement. Specifically, Callaway Golf asserts that Acushnet’s sale of the Titleist Pro V1 family of golf balls infringes four golf ball patents that Callaway Golf acquired when it acquired the assets of Top-Flite. Callaway Golf is seeking damages and an injunction to prevent future infringement by Acushnet. In its answer to the Complaint, Acushnet has responded that the patents at issue are invalid and not infringed by the Pro V1 golf balls. Acushnet also has filed petitions for reexamination with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). Although the PTO agreed the petitions for reexamination raised certain substantial new questions of patentability, and has issued a first office action preliminarily rejecting the claims of all four of the patents, based on some of the arguments advanced by Acushnet, the PTO has not made a final and binding determination as to the validity of the patents. The validity of the asserted patents has also not yet been addressed by the District Court. Additionally, the District Court has denied Acushnet’s motion to stay the litigation pending a re-examination in the PTO. On August 1, 2007, the District Court denied Acushnet’s renewed motion to stay the litigation pending re-examination in the PTO. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. The trial of this matter is set to commence in the District Court on December 3, 2007.

On June 9, 2007, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. C.A. 07-367, asserting claims against Acushnet Company for patent infringement. Callaway Golf asserts that Acushnet’s sale of numerous drivers, including but not limited to the King Cobra 454 Comp, King Cobra F Speed, King Cobra HS9 F Speed, King Cobra HS9 M speed, and King Cobra LD F Speed, Titleist 905R, Titleist 905S and Titleist 905T drivers infringes one or more of U.S. patent numbers 6,348,015; 6,478,692; 6,669,579; 6,685,576; and 6,949,032. Callaway Golf is seeking damages and an injunction to prevent future infringement. Acushnet has answered the complaint denying infringement of any valid patent and asserting counterclaims against Callaway Golf. Acushnet asserts that sales of Callaway Golf’s FT-i, FT-5, X-460, X-460 Tour, Big Bertha Fusion FT-3 and Big Bertha 460 drivers infringes two patents issued to Acushnet, namely U.S. patent numbers 6,960,142 and 7,041,003. Acushnet seeks damages and an injunction as well. Callaway Golf responded to the counterclaim on August 31, 2007, denying infringement of any valid patent claim. The parties are engaged in preliminary discovery. The trial of this matter is set to commence in the District Court on May 18, 2009.

On August 1, 2007, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 207CV329, asserting claims of patent infringement against TaylorMade Golf Company, Inc. Specifically, Callaway Golf is asserting that sales of certain TaylorMade irons infringe Callaway

 

42


Golf’s U.S. patent No. 5,704,849. Callaway Golf is seeking damages and an injunction to prevent future infringement. On September 4, 2007, TaylorMade answered the complaint denying infringement. The parties are engaged in motion and discovery practice.

On August 4, 2007, Callaway Golf filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. 07 CV 1424, asserting claims against TaylorMade Golf Company, Inc. for patent infringement and seeking declaratory relief. Specifically, Callaway Golf asserts that TaylorMade’s sales of its TP Red and TP Black golf balls infringe Callaway Golf’s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,638,185 and 7,160,207, which relate to multi-layer golf balls. Callaway Golf is also seeking declarations of license, invalidity, unenforceability, and/or non-infringement of TaylorMade’s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,991,558, 7,198,575, 6,719,644, and 6,547,678. TaylorMade filed an answer and counterclaim asserting non-infringement and/or invalidity of Callaway Golf’s golf ball patents. TaylorMade also asserts that certain of Callaway Golf’s drivers, including the FT-i, FT-5, and Big Bertha 460 infringe its above-named patents and related patent applications. In addition, Taylor Made is seeking declarations of invalidity, unenforceability, and non-infringement of Callaway Golf’s U.S. Patent Nos. 5,704,849, 5,409,229 and 5,605,511, which relate to undercut irons. The parties are engaged in motion and discovery practice.

The Company and its subsidiaries, incident to their business activities, are parties to a number of legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims, including the matters specifically noted above. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes are not predictable with assurance. Consequently, management is unable to estimate the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability, amounts which may be covered by insurance, or the financial impact with respect to these matters. Management believes at this time that the final resolution of these matters, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s consolidated annual results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Certain Factors Affecting Callaway Golf Company

The Company has included in Part I, Item 1A of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, a description of certain risks and uncertainties that could affect the Company’s business, future performance or financial condition (the “Risk Factors”). There are no material changes from the disclosure provided in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 with respect to the Risk Factors. Investors should consider the Risk Factors prior to making an investment decision with respect to the Company’s stock.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In June 2006, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized it to repurchase shares of its common stock in the open market or in private transactions, subject to the Company’s assessment of market conditions and buying opportunities, up to a maximum cost to the Company of $50.0 million, which would remain in effect until completed or otherwise terminated by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors authorized a new repurchase program (the “June 2007 repurchase program”) for the Company to repurchase shares of its common stock up to a maximum cost to the Company of $100.0 million, which remains in effect until completed or otherwise terminated by the Board of Directors.

Under the June 2007 repurchase program, during the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company repurchased 4,444,000 shares of its common stock at an average cost per share of $16.87 for a total cost of $75.0 million. As of September 30, 2007, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to an additional $22.2 million of its common stock under the June 2007 repurchase program. The Company’s repurchases of shares of common stock are recorded at the average cost of the common stock held in treasury and result in a reduction of shareholders’ equity.

 

43


The following schedule summarizes the status of the Company’s repurchase programs (in thousands, except per share data):

 

     Three Months Ended September 30,
     2007
    

Total Number

of Shares

Purchased

  

Weighted

Average Price

Paid per Share

  

Total Number

of Shares

Purchased as

Part of

Publicly

Announced

Programs

  

Maximum

Dollar

Value that

May Yet Be

Purchased

Under the

Programs

July 1, 2007 – July 31, 2007

   545    $ 17.22    545    $ 87,780

August 1, 2007 – August 31, 2007

   2,872    $ 17.15    2,872    $ 38,515

September 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007

   1,027    $ 15.90    1,027    $ 22,185
                       

Total

   4,444    $ 16.87    4,444    $ 22,185
                       

 

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

 

Item 5. Other Information

None.

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

  3.1    Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated herein by this reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) on July 1, 1999 (file no. 1-10962).
  3.2    Third Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended and restated as of December 3, 2003, incorporated herein by this reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Commission on March 15, 2004 (file no. 1-10962).
  4.1    Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated herein by this reference to the Prospectus in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, as filed with the Commission on March 29, 1994 (file no. 33-77024).
31.1    Certification of George Fellows pursuant to Rule13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†
31.2    Certification of Bradley J. Holiday pursuant to Rule13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†
32.1    Certification of George Fellows and Bradley J. Holiday pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†

(†) Included with this Report.

 

44


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY
By:  

/s/    BRADLEY J. HOLIDAY        

  Bradley J. Holiday
 

Senior Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 2, 2007

 

45


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit   

Description

31.1    Certification of George Fellows pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2    Certification of Bradley J. Holiday pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1    Certification of George Fellows and Bradley J. Holiday pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

46

Certification

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, George Fellows, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Callaway Golf Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/    GEORGE FELLOWS        

George Fellows

President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 2, 2007

A signed original of this Certification has been provided to Callaway Golf Company and will be retained by Callaway Golf Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Certification

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Bradley J. Holiday, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Callaway Golf Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/    BRADLEY J. HOLIDAY        

Bradley J. Holiday

Senior Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 2, 2007

A signed original of this Certification has been provided to Callaway Golf Company and will be retained by Callaway Golf Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Certifcation

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Callaway Golf Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “10-Q Report”), that:

(1) the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

The undersigned have executed this Certification effective as of November 2, 2007.

 

/s/    GEORGE FELLOWS        

George Fellows

President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/    BRADLEY J. HOLIDAY        

Bradley J. Holiday

Senior Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this Certification has been provided to Callaway Golf Company and will be retained by Callaway Golf Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.